Washington, D.C. – President Donald Trump announced his intention to issue an executive order banning mail-in ballots and electronic voting machines for the 2026 midterm elections, a move seen as likely to favor his Republican Party but certain to face significant legal challenges.
The pledge, made via a social media post and reinforced during remarks at the White House, is part of Trump’s broader effort to reshape the electoral landscape, including urging Republican-led states like Texas and Indiana to redraw congressional districts to boost GOP candidates.
With federal elections administered by states, experts question the president’s constitutional authority to enact such a measure, predicting swift opposition from states and voting rights advocates.
Trump’s Proposal and Political Strategy
In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.” He argued for replacing electronic systems with paper ballots and hand-counts, claiming they are “faster” and leave “NO DOUBT” about election outcomes.
Later, at the White House, Trump emphasized that the Republican Party must rally behind the effort to maintain power, noting that an executive order is being drafted by “the best lawyers in the country.”
The November 3, 2026, midterms will serve as the first nationwide test of Trump’s second-term domestic and foreign policies since his January inauguration.
Democrats, aiming to reclaim control of the House and Senate, view the elections as critical to countering Trump’s agenda. With Democratic voters historically more likely to use mail-in ballots particularly the elderly, disabled and overseas voters, Trump’s proposed ban could disproportionately impact their turnout, potentially tilting close races toward Republicans.
Constitutional and Legal Hurdles
Trump’s assertion that states are “merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes” and must follow presidential directives has drawn sharp rebuke from legal experts.
Richard Pildes, a New York University Law School professor specializing in democracy-related legal issues, stated, “The President has no power constitutionally to dictate to states the manner in which they conduct national elections.” Under Article I, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, states hold authority over the “times, places and manner” of federal elections, subject only to congressional regulation.
Legal challenges are expected, as states like California and New York, which rely heavily on mail-in voting, are likely to sue to protect their electoral autonomy. A June 2025 federal court ruling already blocked parts of a prior Trump executive order attempting to restrict mail-in ballots received after Election Day, citing the president’s lack of authority.
Election officials also argue that hand-counting ballots, as Trump proposes, is time-consuming, costly, and less accurate than machine counts, potentially delaying results and increasing errors.
Trump’s History with Election Claims
Trump’s push to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines echoes his long-standing, unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud, including his false narrative that he, not Joe Biden, won the 2020 election.
Despite extensive studies, including a 2020 statement from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency calling that election “the most secure in American history,” evidence of significant fraud remains negligible. Trump has also criticized voting machines as “inaccurate” and “controversial,” though no credible data supports claims of systemic errors.
Ironically, Trump voted by mail in several elections, including 2024, and encouraged his supporters to do so, highlighting a shift in his stance.
Republican-led states like Florida have embraced mail-in voting as a secure and accessible option, with nearly a third of 2024 ballots cast by mail nationwide, down from 43% during the 2020 pandemic peak, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Every state offers some form of absentee or mail-in voting, per the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Why It Matters
Trump’s announcement follows a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where he claimed Putin agreed on ending mail-in balloting, though no evidence supports this. The pledge aligns with other efforts to bolster Republican electoral prospects, such as redistricting in GOP-controlled states.
Posts on X reflect polarized reactions, with MAGA supporters like @ProudElephantUS and @TuckerCNews rallying behind Trump’s call to “stop the steal,” while critics, including the Democratic National Committee’s Marcus W. Robinson, label the plan “legally baseless” and a threat to voting rights, particularly for military, elderly and disabled voters.
The proposed ban could face resistance even within the GOP, as states like Florida benefit from mail-in voting’s accessibility. A potential executive order, if issued, would likely be struck down in court, but the rhetoric alone may deepen voter mistrust ahead of 2026. Public sentiment on X shows growing skepticism, with hashtags like #ElectionIntegrity trending alongside warnings of disenfranchisement.
HOTTEST STORIES NOW
- Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Gets Zero Votes in a New York County
- Video shows lawmaker stuffing ballots in swing state that Trump only won by 80,000 votes
- Epstein Survivor Testifies She Met Donald Trump at Age 14, Other Disturbing Revelations Emerge
What Next?
As the midterm elections approach, Trump’s executive order, if formalized, will test the balance of federal and state powers. Legal battles could delay or derail the effort, while congressional Democrats and voting rights groups prepare to challenge any restrictions.
The controversy shows ongoing debates over election security and access, with implications for turnout and trust in the democratic process. For now, Trump’s pledge has set the stage for a contentious fight, as both parties brace for a high-stakes electoral showdown in 2026.
Discover more from Local Stories
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.